Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
accounting times logo

Powered by MOMENTUMMEDIA

Powered by MOMENTUMMEDIA

Accountant denied TPB registration over supervision concerns

Profession
24 July 2024
accountant denied tpb registration over supervision concerns

Work experience requirements are essential for tax agent registration and maintain public trust in the profession, the AAT has ruled.

A Queensland practitioner’s bid to become a tax agent has been crushed by the AAT after the tribunal ruled he failed to show enough evidence to meet supervision requirements.

In a judgment this week, the AAT sided with the TPB which had rejected Quansheng Dou’s May 2023 registration application on work experience grounds.

Senior member Diana Benk said that the registration of an individual as a tax agent was “significant” but Dou’s evidence was unpersuasive and inconsistent.

==
==

“End users and the public in general should be able to trust that an individual registered by the board has the degree of experience and the core competencies required to meet the complexities of our taxation system,” she said.

Under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2022, prospective tax agents must show they are a “fit and proper person”.

If an applicant meets tertiary education requirements, the regulations require them to show evidence of at least one year of full-time relevant experience (or part-time equivalent) in the last five years under the “supervision and control” of a registered tax agent.

Dou had worked as an accountant at Twin Cities Tax & Accounting, a small Queensland-based practice for several years.

He argued he had adequate supervision from his employer, Malcolm Howarth, describing a work environment where Howarth was “always staying beside me”, providing daily mentoring, allocating work and frequently reviewing drafts.

Dou also produced provided information on the number and types of returns he worked on, including individual, partnership and trust returns.

He also said that despite learning Howarth had prepared 46 returns incorrectly, they all occurred during FY 2020/21, and outside that period “the board had no cause to suspect that Mr Howarth was not competent to provide taxation services and supervision”.

But Howarth’s errors were not limited to a single financial year, the AAT said.

A 2016 ATO audit found a tax shortfall of over $63,276 for nine returns he prepared, and a FY 2021/22 audit that found a shortfall of $259,935 for 54 returns.

The TPB had also terminated Howarth’s registration in 2022 from an ATO referral over concerns he was “systemically claimed deductions for clients which had no nexus to income”.

Benk said Howarth’s past errors put his ability to oversee Dou’s work in doubt.

“Mr Howarth suggested that he checked “each and every return” and the primary documents,” she said.

“Given Mr Howarth had his registration terminated because of shortcomings and inaccuracies in these areas, I have reservations about the evidence and find that I cannot place significant weight on it.”

Benk also took issue with Howarth’s testimony. Howarth gave evidence suggesting Dou needed little supervision due to his qualifications, contradicting Dou's account of rigorous oversight. Howarth suggested supervision occurred mainly when Dou "flagged" issues, falling short of the required "oversight and superintendence."

It was also insufficient to argue that the requirement was satisfied by “doing time” or attending work regularly in the presence of a registered agent in a tax practice.

“Presence and supervision are two distinct terms,” she said. “Overall, I find there is a paucity of evidence verifying the level of ‘supervision and control’ of the applicant.”

She said tax agent registration was “significant … in an increasingly complex and regulated landscape”.

“The ‘supervision and control’ which forms the cornerstone of registration must be demonstrated and established to an actual and persuasive level of satisfaction,” she said, adding the requirement could only be achieved if it was “legally and factually accurate, genuine, enforced with checks and balances and easily demonstrable/verifiable”.

“The requirement of supervision and control is not contingent on the size of the practice, but a mandatory requirement for all individuals seeking registration.”

About the author

author image

Christine Chen is a graduate journalist at Accountants Daily and Accounting Times, the leading sources of news, insight, and educational content for professionals in the accounting sector. Previously, Christine has written for City Hub, the South Sydney Herald and Honi Soit. She has also produced online content for LegalVision and completed internships at EY and Deloitte. Christine has a commerce degree from the University of Western Australia and is studying a Juris Doctor degree at the University of Sydney.

Subscribe

Join our subscribers get exclusive access to freebies and the latest news

Subscribe now!
NEED TO KNOW